Article: De‑bordering policies at the city scale: strategies for building resilience in Barcelona’s migration governance

by Ricard Zapata-Barrero

Citation:

Zapata-Barrero, R. De-bordering policies at the city scale: strategies for building resilience in Barcelona’s migration governance. Comparative Migration Studies 12, 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-023-00361-0

Abstract
This article bridges the fields of urban politics, migration governance and border studies by exploring Barcelona as a case study. It raises a first critical question about what happens to so-called borderlands when “borders” move to other scales, such as cities that are not usually categorized as “border cities”. Within this framing debate, this study explores two fundamental questions: (1) how border practices at the state level shape constrained relations between cities and migrants, and (2) how cities map debordering policies to resolve such constraints, which we conceptualise as an example of ’urban resilience’. The aim is to provide a focus that brings the analytical category of “urban resilience”, recently proposed within the emerging debate on the “local turn” in migration studies, to bear on issues directly related to the social impacts of state bordering processes on urban systems. The article then argues that urban justice principles drive most cities to initiate resilient de-bordering policies, and can be seen as a distinctive normative factor underpinning urban resilience when applied to migration governance. After laying the groundwork for this theoretical framework and its application to the city of Barcelona, the final section briefly outlines the potential of this new and crucial critical area of migration research. This will provide yet another  opportunity to highlight that we are likely to enter an era in which cities will increasingly become sovereign  geopolitical entities within and beyond the traditional hierarchical reach of their own states.